Zum Hauptinhalt springen Zur Suche springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen
Beschreibung
'A Legal Study on AI Inventorship Under Patent Law in Germany and the United States': This thesis asks a provocative question: Can AI be an inventor? The answer is: Yes. By applying the '2/7 Questions Process' from German and US patent law, it compares inventorship rules and evaluates the roles of humans and AI. Legal theories, historical precedents, and philosophical reflections together show that recognizing AI inventorship is both legally plausible and conceptually justified.
'A Legal Study on AI Inventorship Under Patent Law in Germany and the United States': This thesis asks a provocative question: Can AI be an inventor? The answer is: Yes. By applying the '2/7 Questions Process' from German and US patent law, it compares inventorship rules and evaluates the roles of humans and AI. Legal theories, historical precedents, and philosophical reflections together show that recognizing AI inventorship is both legally plausible and conceptually justified.
Über den Autor
Myung-Ji Kang erwarb den Bachelor of Law an der Hankuk University of Foreign Studies und absolvierte anschließend an der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen unter der Betreuung von Prof. Dr. Andreas Wiebe, LL.M. (Virginia) ihren Master und ihre Promotion in Rechtswissenschaft. Ihre Forschungsschwerpunkte liegen im IT-, Immaterialgüter-, Datenschutz- und KI-Recht, insbesondere im Zusammenspiel von technologischer Innovation, geistigem Eigentum, Privatsphäre und Regulierung autonomer Systeme.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
1. Introduction
Background - Previous Literature - Gaps in Existing Literature and Contribution of This Study - Overview of the Structure - Scope of the Research

2. Understanding AI in the Patent Field
Three Key Components Defining AI and the Significance of Understanding Software - Understanding AI Software - Today's Mass Production of AI Inventions - Comparison between AI Software and Human Brain

3. Comparative Studies of the Requirements for Inventorship Under Patent Law in Germany and the US
Introduction - Three Preliminary Remarks - The Invention Process - The Application Process - The Official Position of the Patent Office and Courts in both Germany and the US on AI Inventorship - Final Remarks and Critical Reflection

4. The 2/7 Questions and Possible AI-related Candidates for Inventors when AI is Excluded
Introduction - The 2/7 Questions: The Requirements for Inventorship - Possibility of Each Candidate's Inventorship - Possibility of Joint Inventorship of all Possible Candidates

5. Empty Column to 'Inventor's Name'
Introduction - No Room for Unnamed Inventors in Existing Legal Frameworks - Three Models of Inventor Attribution - Why the Inventor Field Must Not Be Empty: Legal, Procedural, and Ethical Implications

6. Affirmation of AI Inventorship
Opposing AI as Inventor: Arguments and Counterarguments - The Four-Perspective Analysis in Support of AI Inventorship

7. E-Person as Inventor
The Current Legal Situation: The Inventor as a Formal Expression and the Inventor as a Substantive Truth - Establishment of E-Persons - E-Persons in Patent Law: Conceptualizing the Legal Subject of the Inventive Process
Details
Erscheinungsjahr: 2026
Fachbereich: BGB
Genre: Recht, Sozialwissenschaften, Wirtschaft
Produktart: Nachschlagewerke
Rubrik: Recht & Wirtschaft
Medium: Taschenbuch
Inhalt: 228 S.
5 s/w Illustr.
8 s/w Tab.
13 Illustr.
5 Fotos
8 Tab.
ISBN-13: 9783428196104
ISBN-10: 3428196104
Sprache: Englisch
Herstellernummer: 19610
Einband: Kartoniert / Broschiert
Autor: Kang, Myung-Ji
Auflage: 1. Auflage
Hersteller: Duncker & Humblot GmbH
Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9, D-12165 Berlin, info@duncker-humblot.de
Abbildungen: 8 Tabellen, 5 Abbildungen; 228 S., 5 Schwarz-Weiß- Abbildungen, 8 Schwarz-Weiß- Tabellen
Maße: 229 x 152 x 16 mm
Von/Mit: Myung-Ji Kang
Erscheinungsdatum: 16.02.2026
Gewicht: 0,36 kg
Artikel-ID: 134561358