He says knowledge comes from sense impressions, and ideas are a copy; they are less clear and intense than the original impression. The mind brings thoughts via their association, what he calls "a principle of connection." They resemble contiguity, cause, and results. There are two different ways to justify a causal case: relations of thoughts or matters of truth. For example, "This room doesn't have four walls" isn't problematic; the room could have three walls. The authenticity of any statement relies upon its establishment in experience or the memory of the experience. Hume argues that the possibility of a causal connection joining one event with another is just a psychological habit. The conviction that the sun will rise tomorrow connects with the level of probability that it will. Since he denies information on causation, Hume doesn't feel that things occur by coincidence. Belief in probability judgments communicates a degree of certainty about a future event. The hypothesis of Hume contends that human activity is administered by regular regulations, similarly as normal occasions are represented by regulations. Human thought processes are not really associated with their activities, but rather, Hume contends, they are continually conjoined.
He says knowledge comes from sense impressions, and ideas are a copy; they are less clear and intense than the original impression. The mind brings thoughts via their association, what he calls "a principle of connection." They resemble contiguity, cause, and results. There are two different ways to justify a causal case: relations of thoughts or matters of truth. For example, "This room doesn't have four walls" isn't problematic; the room could have three walls. The authenticity of any statement relies upon its establishment in experience or the memory of the experience. Hume argues that the possibility of a causal connection joining one event with another is just a psychological habit. The conviction that the sun will rise tomorrow connects with the level of probability that it will. Since he denies information on causation, Hume doesn't feel that things occur by coincidence. Belief in probability judgments communicates a degree of certainty about a future event. The hypothesis of Hume contends that human activity is administered by regular regulations, similarly as normal occasions are represented by regulations. Human thought processes are not really associated with their activities, but rather, Hume contends, they are continually conjoined.
Über den Autor
David Hume (1711-1776) was a Scottish philosopher, historian, essayist, and one of the central figures of the Enlightenment. Born in Edinburgh, Hume became one of the most influential thinkers in the English language through his work on human nature, knowledge, causation, belief, religion, morality, politics, and history. His early Treatise of Human Nature did not receive the attention he hoped for, but his later essays, histories, and philosophical enquiries established his reputation as a major modern philosopher. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy describes Hume as generally regarded as one of the most important philosophers to write in English, and notes that he was also well known in his own time as a [...]'s philosophy is marked by scepticism, clarity, empirical method, and a refusal to accept inherited explanations without examining how human beings actually think, feel, believe, and judge. In works such as An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, and The History of England, he helped define modern debates about causation, induction, religion, moral sentiment, virtue, utility, and political authority. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals is especially important because it presents Hume's mature account of morality as rooted in human sentiment, sympathy, usefulness, and social life rather than in abstract rationalism alone.
