This book is about the functions of technical artefacts, material objects made to serve practical purposes; objects ranging from tablets of Aspirin to Concorde, from wooden clogs to nuclear submarines. More precisely, the book is about usinganddesigningartefacts, aboutwhatitmeanstoascribefunctionstothem, and about the relations between using, designing and ascribing functions. In the following pages, we present a detailed account that shows how strong these relations are. Technical functions cannot be properly analysed without taking into regard the beliefs and actions of human beings, we contend. This account stays deceptively close to common sense. After all, who would deny that artefacts are for whatever purpose they are designed or used? As we shall show, however, such intentionalist accounts face staunch opposition from other accounts, such as those that focus on long-term reproduction of artefacts. These accounts are partly right and mostly wrong and although we do take a common-sense position in the end, it is only after sophisticated analysis. F- thermore, the results of this analysis reveal that technical functions depend on a larger and more structured set of beliefs and actions than is typically s- posed. Much work in the succeeding pages goes into developing an appropriate action-theoretical account, and forging a connection with function ascriptions.
This book is about the functions of technical artefacts, material objects made to serve practical purposes; objects ranging from tablets of Aspirin to Concorde, from wooden clogs to nuclear submarines. More precisely, the book is about usinganddesigningartefacts, aboutwhatitmeanstoascribefunctionstothem, and about the relations between using, designing and ascribing functions. In the following pages, we present a detailed account that shows how strong these relations are. Technical functions cannot be properly analysed without taking into regard the beliefs and actions of human beings, we contend. This account stays deceptively close to common sense. After all, who would deny that artefacts are for whatever purpose they are designed or used? As we shall show, however, such intentionalist accounts face staunch opposition from other accounts, such as those that focus on long-term reproduction of artefacts. These accounts are partly right and mostly wrong and although we do take a common-sense position in the end, it is only after sophisticated analysis. F- thermore, the results of this analysis reveal that technical functions depend on a larger and more structured set of beliefs and actions than is typically s- posed. Much work in the succeeding pages goes into developing an appropriate action-theoretical account, and forging a connection with function ascriptions.
Über den Autor
Pieter Vermaas studied theoretical physics at the University of Amsterdam and gained a doctorate from Utrecht University on the philosophy of quantum mechanics. Since 1998, he has been affiliated to the Department of Philosophy at Delft University of Technology where he is doing research into the principles of technology. His subjects of interest within that field are the analysis of the concept of technical function as used within engineering, and the description of designing as given by the various design methodologies. Pieter Vermaas studied theoretical physics at the University of Amsterdam and gained a doctorate from Utrecht University on the philosophy of quantum mechanics. Since 1998, he has been affiliated to the Department of Philosophy at Delft University of Technology where he is doing research into the principles of technology. His subjects of interest within that field are the analysis of the concept of technical function as used within engineering, and the description ofdesigning as given by the various design methodologies. Ibo van de Poel is associate professor in ethics and technology at Delft University of Technology. He studied philosophy of science, technology and society at Twente University, where he did a PhD in science and technology studies. He teaches engineering ethics and does research into design and values, the moral acceptability of technological risks, responsibility in research and development networks, the ethics of new emerging technologies, and the notion of technology as a form of social experimentation. Maarten Franssen has degrees in theoretical physics and history and obtained a doctorate in philosophy on issues in the foundations of the social sciences. He joined the Department of Philosophy at Delft University of Technology in 1996. His main areas of research are conceptions of normativity and rationality in general, the application of rational decision-making methods in scientific and technical research, and the formal description of artefacts and systems in technology. Wybo Houkes is a senior lecturer in the Philosophy of Science and Technology Department at Eindhoven University of Technology. He studied theoretical physics in Amsterdam and philosophy in Leiden, where gained his doctorate on Kantianism in early 20th century philosophy. He is currently conducting research into the tension between universal Darwinism and more tailor-made approaches in evolutionary theories of technology, the role of agency in these theories, and into the nature of technological knowledge and the functions of technical artefacts.
Zusammenfassung
First book-length study of technical artefacts and their functions
State-of-the-art resources in analytical philosophy, such as the planning theory of action and analyses of testimony
Provides a framework for describing and evaluating artefact use and design
First and only theory of artefact functions that is faithful to the phenomenology of artefact use
Positioning of the functions of artefacts against those of biological items
Typical example of the new school of philosophy of technology that studies engineering and technology on its own merits
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Chapter 1 Introduction.- Chapter 2 Use, plans and designing.- 2.1 Artefacts and actions.- 2.2 Use plans.- 2.3 Planning in use.- 2.4 Designing plans.- 2.6 Standards for use plans.- 2.7 Evaluating artefact use and design.- Chapter 3 Function theories.- 3.1 Function theories for technical artefacts.- 3.2 The intentional function theory.- 3.3 Cummins.causal-role theory of functions.- 3.4 The evolutionist function theory.- 3.5 Combining the basic theories.- 4.1 A use-plan approach towards functions.- 4.2 Function ascriptions.- 4.3 Assessing the function ascriptions.- 4.4 Functional roles.- Chapter 5 Malfunctioning.- 5.1 The phenomenon of artefact malfunctioning.- 5.2 Having capacities versus exercising them.- 5.3 Artefact normativity.- Chapter 6 Engineering, science and biology.- 6.2 Engineering.- 6.3 Physics and chemistry.- 6.4 Biology.- 6.5 A biological and generalised ICE-theory.- Chapter 7 The nature of artefacts.- 7.1 Functions as conceptual drawbridges.- 7.2 Against function essentialism.- 7.3 Plan relativism.- 7.4 Useful and man-made materials.
